| 1 | \documentclass{article} |
|---|
| 2 | \usepackage{fullpage,lmodern} |
|---|
| 3 | \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} |
|---|
| 4 | \begin{document} |
|---|
| 5 | \title{Multicomponent Evaporation Kinetics} |
|---|
| 6 | \date{June 19, 2005} |
|---|
| 7 | \author{Adam Powell} |
|---|
| 8 | \maketitle |
|---|
| 9 | |
|---|
| 10 | This short description of multicomponent evaporation begins with a |
|---|
| 11 | thermodynamic description of vapor pressure and the Langmuir equation of pure |
|---|
| 12 | element evaporation, then derives an ``evaporation ratio'' which relates the |
|---|
| 13 | ratio of components in the vapor to the ratio in the evaporating liquid or |
|---|
| 14 | solid. For a dilute solute, this evaporation ratio is related to the activity |
|---|
| 15 | coefficient. |
|---|
| 16 | |
|---|
| 17 | \paragraph{The Clausius-Clapeyron Equation} |
|---|
| 18 | |
|---|
| 19 | The Clausius-Clapeyron equation gives the vapor pressure of a liquid or solid |
|---|
| 20 | as a function of temperature. For two phases of the same chemical compound in |
|---|
| 21 | equilibrium, changes in free energy along a coexistence curve are equal: |
|---|
| 22 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 23 | \label{eq:dgsame} |
|---|
| 24 | dG_1 = dG_2 \Rightarrow |
|---|
| 25 | V_1dP_1 - S_1dT_1 = V_2dP_2 - S_2dP_2. |
|---|
| 26 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 27 | Since the pressures and temperatures of the two phases are the same, this can |
|---|
| 28 | be expressed in terms of changes in volume and entropy, to give an expression |
|---|
| 29 | for $dP/dT$: |
|---|
| 30 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 31 | \label{eq:dpdt} |
|---|
| 32 | \Delta V dP = \Delta S dT \Rightarrow \frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{\Delta S}{\Delta |
|---|
| 33 | V}. |
|---|
| 34 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 35 | This condition, called the Clapeyron equation, applies across liquid-solid, |
|---|
| 36 | liquid-gas and solid-gas transitions in pressure-temperature space. For |
|---|
| 37 | example, in most substances, the volume change during melting $\Delta V_m$ is |
|---|
| 38 | positive, and since melting increases entropy, $\Delta S_m/\Delta V_m$ is |
|---|
| 39 | positive, as is the slope of the pressure-temperature coexistence curve. For |
|---|
| 40 | the few such as water and silicon where the volume change during melting is |
|---|
| 41 | negative, that slope is negative. |
|---|
| 42 | |
|---|
| 43 | \begin{figure}[htbp] |
|---|
| 44 | \centering \pdfimageresolution 330 |
|---|
| 45 | $\ $\pdfximage{SLVmet.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage$\ $ |
|---|
| 46 | $\ $\pdfximage{SLVwater.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage$\ $ |
|---|
| 47 | \caption{Schematic phase diagrams for an element/compound: typical metal |
|---|
| 48 | (left), water or silicon (right).} |
|---|
| 49 | \label{fig:PTphases} |
|---|
| 50 | \end{figure}In evaporation, the volume of the gas is so much larger than that |
|---|
| 51 | of the liquid that $\Delta V_v$ is approximately the gas volume, which on a |
|---|
| 52 | molar basis is $RT/P$ according to the ideal gas law; thus: |
|---|
| 53 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 54 | \label{eq:almostclausclap} |
|---|
| 55 | \frac{dP_v}{dT} = \frac{P_v}{RT}\Delta S_v. |
|---|
| 56 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 57 | Since the free energy change at the coexistence curve is zero, $\Delta |
|---|
| 58 | G_v=0=\Delta H_v-T\Delta S_v$, and the entropy change is simply $\Delta |
|---|
| 59 | S_v=\Delta H_v/T$. This substitution and some rearrangement gives an equation |
|---|
| 60 | which on integration yields the Clausius-Clapeyron equation: |
|---|
| 61 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 62 | \label{eq:clausclap1} |
|---|
| 63 | \frac{dP_v}{P_v} = \frac{dT}{RT}\frac{\Delta H_v}{T} = |
|---|
| 64 | \frac{\Delta H_v}{RT^2}dT, |
|---|
| 65 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 66 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 67 | \label{eq:clauslap} |
|---|
| 68 | \ln P_v = -\frac{\Delta H_v}{RT} + B, |
|---|
| 69 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 70 | where $B$ is the integration constant. If $\Delta H_v$ depends linearly on |
|---|
| 71 | temperature, a third term $C\ln T$ is added, and in some cases a fourth term |
|---|
| 72 | $DT$ is also added to improve fit to data. In tables\footnote{For example, |
|---|
| 73 | {\em Smithells Metals Handbook} (E. Brandes ed., Butterworth, 1983) has these |
|---|
| 74 | constants for numerous metals.}, this is summarized: |
|---|
| 75 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 76 | \label{eq:finalclausclap} |
|---|
| 77 | \log P_v = -\frac{A}{T} + B + C\log T + DT. |
|---|
| 78 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 79 | |
|---|
| 80 | For a multi-component liquid or solid, the vapor pressure of each component is |
|---|
| 81 | its activity $a$ times the vapor pressure of the pure substance. From this |
|---|
| 82 | point on, $\bar{P}_v$ will denote the vapor pressure of the pure substance and |
|---|
| 83 | $P_v=a\bar{P}_v$ its partial pressure in solution. |
|---|
| 84 | |
|---|
| 85 | \paragraph{Evaporation Into a Vacuum: the Langmuir Equation} |
|---|
| 86 | |
|---|
| 87 | For a gas with energies following a Boltzmann distribution, the number of atoms |
|---|
| 88 | (moles) striking a surface per unit area per unit time is given by: |
|---|
| 89 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 90 | \label{eq:langmuir} |
|---|
| 91 | J = \frac{P}{\sqrt{2\pi MRT}}. |
|---|
| 92 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 93 | At equilibrium, the flux of evaporating atoms leaving the surface equals that |
|---|
| 94 | arriving at the surface, so replacing $P$ with $P_v$ in equation |
|---|
| 95 | \ref{eq:langmuir} gives its evaporation flux. Take away the gas, and this |
|---|
| 96 | gives the net evaporation rate into a vacuum. The vapor pressures and |
|---|
| 97 | evaporation fluxes of several metallic elements are given in figure |
|---|
| 98 | \ref{fig:metalvap} below. Three lessons to draw from that figure are: |
|---|
| 99 | \begin{itemize} |
|---|
| 100 | \item Vapor pressures and evaporation rates are {\em very strong} functions of |
|---|
| 101 | temperature, much stronger than convective heat transfer coefficients or |
|---|
| 102 | evaporation rates. |
|---|
| 103 | \item Vapor pressure decreases with increasing melting point. |
|---|
| 104 | \item $\bar{P}_v$ and $J$ curves do not change their slopes or shapes |
|---|
| 105 | dramatically across melting points. |
|---|
| 106 | \end{itemize} |
|---|
| 107 | \begin{figure}[htbp] |
|---|
| 108 | |
|---|
| 109 | \centering \pdfimageresolution 230 |
|---|
| 110 | $\ $\pdfximage{elem-pv.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage$\ $ |
|---|
| 111 | $\ $\pdfximage{elem-J.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage$\ $ |
|---|
| 112 | \caption{Vapor pressures $\bar{P}_v$ (left) and evaporation rates $J$ (right) |
|---|
| 113 | of pure elements. Small circles represent melting points. From Schiller, |
|---|
| 114 | Heisig and Panzer, {\em Electron Beam Technology}, Wiley, 1982.} |
|---|
| 115 | \label{fig:metalvap} |
|---|
| 116 | \end{figure} |
|---|
| 117 | |
|---|
| 118 | \paragraph{Reaction Rate Coefficients} |
|---|
| 119 | |
|---|
| 120 | For an element or compound preferentially evaporating from a solution into a |
|---|
| 121 | vacuum, a first order heterogeneous rate coefficient $k''$ can describe its |
|---|
| 122 | removal from the surface: |
|---|
| 123 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 124 | \label{eq:heteratecoeff} |
|---|
| 125 | J_B = k''_B C_B, |
|---|
| 126 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 127 | where $J_B$ is the molar flux of species $B$ from the surface (the ``reaction |
|---|
| 128 | rate'') and $C_B$ is its molar concentration at the surface of the solution. |
|---|
| 129 | The units of $k''$ are length/time, and this can be thought of as a diffusive |
|---|
| 130 | average velocity of the solute atoms through the solution near the surface. |
|---|
| 131 | |
|---|
| 132 | Note that if the surface concentration is not known, one can often estimate a |
|---|
| 133 | mass transfer coefficient $h_D$ relating flux to difference between the surface |
|---|
| 134 | and bulk concentrations. The sum of the two resistances due to diffusion |
|---|
| 135 | through the surface boundary layer $1/h_D$ and evaporation $1/k''$ then |
|---|
| 136 | describes the total resistance to transport from the bulk to the gas phase. |
|---|
| 137 | |
|---|
| 138 | Because a solute's partial vapor pressure $P_{vB}$ is its activity $a_B$ |
|---|
| 139 | times its pure vapor pressure $\bar{P}_{vB}$, its evaporation flux $J_B$ is the |
|---|
| 140 | product of activity and evaporation rate of the pure substance: |
|---|
| 141 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 142 | \label{eq:partialvap} |
|---|
| 143 | J_B = \frac{P_{vB}}{\sqrt{2\pi M_BRT}} = |
|---|
| 144 | \frac{a_B\bar{P}_{vB}}{\sqrt{2\pi M_BRT}}. |
|---|
| 145 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 146 | For a dilute solution of solute $B$ in solvent $A$ in the Henry's Law |
|---|
| 147 | r\'{e}gime, the activity is proportional to mole fraction $X_B$, and the |
|---|
| 148 | proportionality constant defines the activity coefficient $\gamma_B$: |
|---|
| 149 | $a_B=\gamma_BX_B$. The mole fraction, in turn, is the quotient of solute |
|---|
| 150 | concentration $C_B$ and the sum of all concentrations, which in dilute solution |
|---|
| 151 | is approximately the solvent molar density: |
|---|
| 152 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 153 | \label{eq:molefrac} |
|---|
| 154 | X_B = \frac{C_B}{\sum C_i} \simeq \frac{C_B}{C_A} = \frac{C_B M_A}{\rho}, |
|---|
| 155 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 156 | where $\rho$ is the solution density. Substituting equation \ref{eq:molefrac} |
|---|
| 157 | and the definition of the activity coefficient into equation |
|---|
| 158 | \ref{eq:partialvap} yields an expression of solute flux $J_B$ which is |
|---|
| 159 | proportional to concentration $C_B$, and an expression for reaction rate |
|---|
| 160 | coefficient $k''_B$: |
|---|
| 161 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 162 | \label{eq:finalrate} |
|---|
| 163 | J_B = \frac{\gamma_BC_BM_A}{\rho}\frac{\bar{P}_{vB}}{\sqrt{2\pi M_BRT}} = |
|---|
| 164 | k''_B C_B, |
|---|
| 165 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 166 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 167 | \label{eq:finalratecoeff} |
|---|
| 168 | k''_B = \frac{\gamma_BM_A}{\rho}\frac{\bar{P}_{vB}}{\sqrt{2\pi M_BRT}}. |
|---|
| 169 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 170 | This rate coefficient has many uses, {\em e.g.} in models of batch and |
|---|
| 171 | continuous flow reactors, this helps to assess the effectiveness of vacuum |
|---|
| 172 | distillation processes for solute removal. |
|---|
| 173 | |
|---|
| 174 | \paragraph{Evaporation Ratio} |
|---|
| 175 | |
|---|
| 176 | [Adapted from A. Powell, J. Van Den Avyle, B. Damkroger, J. Szekely and U. Pal |
|---|
| 177 | ``Analysis of Multicomponent Evaporation in Electron Beam Melting and Refining |
|---|
| 178 | of Titanium Alloys,'' {\em Metall. Mater. Trans.} {\bf 38B}, 1227-1239 (1997).] |
|---|
| 179 | For a dilute solution (liquid or solid) of solute $B$ in solvent $A$ |
|---|
| 180 | evaporating into a vacuum, the Evaporation Ratio $ER_B$ is defined as: |
|---|
| 181 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 182 | \label{eq:evratdef} |
|---|
| 183 | ER_{\rm B} = \frac{\rm wt\%B_{vapor}/wt\%A_{vapor}} |
|---|
| 184 | {\rm wt\%B_{solution}/wt\%A_{solution}}. |
|---|
| 185 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 186 | This ratio will be equal to the equivalent ratio of mole fractions, and the |
|---|
| 187 | ratio of mole fractions in the vapor is in turn equal to the ratio of Langmuir |
|---|
| 188 | evaporation rates (equation \ref{eq:langmuir}), so the evaporation ratio can be |
|---|
| 189 | rewritten as |
|---|
| 190 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 191 | \label{eq:evrat2} |
|---|
| 192 | ER_{\rm B} = \frac{J_{\rm B}}{X_{\rm B}}\frac{X_{\rm A}}{J_{\rm A}} = |
|---|
| 193 | \frac{P_{v{\rm B}}}{X_{\rm B}\sqrt{M_{\rm B}}} |
|---|
| 194 | \frac{X_{\rm A}\sqrt{M_{\rm A}}}{P_{v{\rm A}}}, |
|---|
| 195 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 196 | where $X_i$ represents the mole fraction of species $i$ in the liquid or solid, |
|---|
| 197 | $P_{vi}$ its vapor pressure, and $M_i$ its molecular weight. Assuming titanium |
|---|
| 198 | activity roughly follows Raoult's law, its vapor pressure is the product of the |
|---|
| 199 | vapor pressure in its pure state and mole fraction in the liquid or solid, so |
|---|
| 200 | we rewrite the evaporation ratio again as |
|---|
| 201 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 202 | \label{eq:evrat3} |
|---|
| 203 | ER_{\rm B} = \frac{P_{v{\rm B}}}{X_{\rm B}\bar{P}_{v{\rm A}}} |
|---|
| 204 | \sqrt{\frac{M_{\rm A}}{M_{\rm B}}}, |
|---|
| 205 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 206 | where $\bar{P}_{vi}$ represents the vapor pressure of pure species $i$. We |
|---|
| 207 | then assume Henrian behavior and use the definition of the activity coefficient |
|---|
| 208 | $P_{v{\rm B}}=\gamma_{\rm B}\bar{p}_{v{\rm B}}X_{\rm B}$ to arrive at |
|---|
| 209 | \begin{equation} |
|---|
| 210 | \label{erlast} |
|---|
| 211 | ER_{\rm B}=\gamma_{\rm B}\frac{\bar{P}_{v{\rm B}}}{\bar{P}_{v{\rm A}}} |
|---|
| 212 | \sqrt{\frac{M_{\rm A}}{M_{\rm B}}}. |
|---|
| 213 | \end{equation} |
|---|
| 214 | |
|---|
| 215 | Thus the evaporation ratio, which relates compositions in the vapor and |
|---|
| 216 | condensed phases, is a simple function of the activity coefficient, pure |
|---|
| 217 | element vapor pressures and molecular weights. |
|---|
| 218 | \end{document} |
|---|
| 219 | |
|---|
| 220 | |
|---|
| 221 | |
|---|